Edison, NJ – Council President Nish Patel is facing criticism for a policy that prevents council members from directly responding to public questions and comments during the meeting.
For almost two hours at Monday’s council meeting, resident after resident came to the podium to ask questions and solicit comments from members of the council and for almost two hours resident after resident returned to their seats without a response.
Under the current rules, residents are granted six minutes to address the council on any matter of concern. However, a draconian interpretation of the rules prevents council members from offering immediate responses, clarifying questions, or engaging in discussion with the speaker.
The practice has been met with disapproval from both residents and fellow council members. Critics argue that it disrespects residents who take the time to attend meetings and voice their concerns. They believe that a cornerstone of democracy is the ability of citizens to engage with their elected officials.
“It’s frustrating to come to a meeting, share my thoughts on an issue, and then not get any acknowledgment or response,” said Ramesh Patel. “It feels like our voices aren’t being heard.”
Some council members have also expressed their dissatisfaction with the policy. “I believe in open communication,” said Councilmember Rich Brescher. “When residents ask questions, we owe them the courtesy of a response. It’s part of our job.”
However, Council President Nish Patel has defended the practice, arguing that it streamlines meetings and prevents them from devolving into unproductive arguments.
As the public backlash intensifies, it’s clear that Edison residents want a council that prioritizes open communication and responsiveness. Whether the current policy will be reformed remains to be seen, but the controversy serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of civic engagement and the vital role that public participation plays in a healthy democracy.
